Thanks - it kind of complicates things internally.... a couple of other folks had suggested this as well which I expected (and appreciate).
I guess my question is whether there is *any* other solutions away from doing it dynamically via Radius? I was thinking of some form of static routing dependant on directly attached next hop? Paul -----Original Message----- From: Dave Weis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:39 AM To: Paul Stewart Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Static Routing Question On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Paul Stewart wrote: > Without messing with Radius, what options do I have to inject these routes > towards the endpoints when they are changing different devices all the time? > This seems like such a simple question but I have yet to come up with an > elegant solution ;) I was thinking that somewhere in our core we could put > the static routes in place? Radius would be the most efficient way to do it, is there a reason you don't want to use it? -- Dave Weis [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.internetsolver.com/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
