Hi, On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 06:58:05PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: > Without messing with Radius, what options do I have to inject these routes > towards the endpoints when they are changing different devices all the time?
Put the routes into Radius. Everything else is just broken.
> This seems like such a simple question but I have yet to come up with an
> elegant solution ;) I was thinking that somewhere in our core we could put
> the static routes in place?
Radius.
(You could do it with BGP, and setup the next-hop accordingly, but it's
still broken to tie "radius things" to "static configuration things that
depend on radius things")
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpfNawRSieK9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
