Thanks all. The vlan dot1q tag native was what we needed. On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Brad Henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chad Whitten wrote: > >> I have a non-cisco access device connecting to a cisco 3750 via gigE. >> The 3750 interface is set for 802.1q trunking with two vlans - 100 and >> 201. Vlan 201 is the native vlan on the cisco interface. Should the >> access device be tagging packets on vlan 201 or leaving them untagged? > > It should be leaving VLAN 201 packets untagged unless you've set > 'vlan dot1q tag native' on the 3750. > > We avoid using the native VLAN for customer traffic and also tag > everything, everywhere in order to avoid accidental propagation of > BPDUs or other L2 control protocols to places they don't belong. > > Regards, > Brad >
-- Chad Whitten Metro Network Solutions (601) 366-6630 Phone (601) 366-6066 Fax (601) 842-6804 Cellular [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
