Thanks .. so far we've only ventured into 7600/6500 core equipment but we do have CMTS to look at in the future .... ;)
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Snyder Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 4:27 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Subnetting - Service Provider On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 04:11:20PM -0400, Paul Stewart wrote: > Thanks for the replies... > > Yeah, I'm getting various pieces of feedback - I'm going with the /126 for > point to point and /128 for loopback on core devices at this point. I don't > trust the autoconfiguration ideas at this point (call it old school) > anyways...;) One issue we ran into was that not all the networking gear we had could support /126. The vendor's (not Cisco) immature support for IPv6 could only understand the concept of /128 loopbacks and /64 subnets. Device in question was a CMTS. Bob _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/