On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:21:27 +0400, Nigel Roy <[email protected]> wrote:
Tried but with no positive result:
bridge irb
bridge 1 route ip
And even:
no bridge 1 bridge ip
I think you need two additional commands:
bridge irb - to enable integrated routing and bridging
bridge 1 route ip - to enable routing of IP from routed network to
bridged.
Regards Nigel
Hi
For the redundancy/failover sake I'm bridging 2 Q-in-Q interfaces.
Here is config:
interface BVI1
ip address 10.67.201.100 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet0/2.4012010
encapsulation dot1Q 401 second-dot1q 2010
no cdp enable
bridge-group 1
interface GigabitEthernet0/3.4012010
encapsulation dot1Q 401 second-dot1q 2010
no cdp enable
bridge-group 1
interface BVI1
ip address 255.255.255.0
bridge 1 protocol ieees
Network looks like this:
Router==QinQ==(MAN Switches Ring)----LanSwitch---Host(10.67.201.5)
Router physically connected to 2 core switches and terminates dot.Q
tunnels.
MAN switches carry vlan tunnels and the when the LAN enters into
the MAN Ring it is assigned outer tag 401.
The Host is inside LAN on VLAN 2010 and connected through access
port. The ip 10.67.201.100 is going to be default GW for the LAN
Host and must remain reachable even if one of the core switches
goes down. When I assign IP address to either G0/2.4012010 or
G0/3.4012010 sub interfaces I'm able to ping it from the Host. But
after bridging them I can't ping BVI1 from the Host. What am I
doing wrong? Is it supposed to work this way?
Regards, Victor
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
