Wow! Arrogance at its best ;-)
Sure been around Cisco long enough and infact been _IN_ Cisco long
enough..
but I simply wanted to point out the fact that it was uneccessary what
you pointed out. No offense!!
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
If you haven't been around Cisco long enough to know not to assume,
then be my guest.
But, that's poor advice to offer a person that is somewhat new (or
new) to Cisco. That's how bad habits start.
tv
----- Original Message ----- From: "Binh Phan" <[email protected]>
To: "Tony Varriale" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT and PAT on ASA
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
I would recommend completing your static with the appropriate
netmask.
>>You do not need to specify netmask in this case since it's a /32
and will be auto-completed when you enter the command in CLI.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
