The original user was asking for assistance on what would be the right
configuration specific to his scenario which was a host static NAT and
Ryan simply provided that.
I simply saw what you stated was not adding any value to the
discussion other than what seemed to be fault finding, as adding
netmask in this case, OR NOT makes absolutely no difference. Maybe I
read it wrong and if so I apologize.
Agree, best practices are important but it's irrelevant in this
context or discussion, IMO.
--Binh
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:37 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
You pointed out, to me, on how to complete a command. I don't need
assistance with that.
I pointed out that it is best to offer people that are newer to
Cisco and/or a specific platform best practices (for many reasons).
Here's an example from my home ASA on why best practices...are best
practices:
homepix(config)# static (inside,outside) 58.66.76.88 192.168.0.100
homepix(config)# sh run static
static (inside,outside) 58.66.76.88 192.168.0.100 netmask
255.255.255.255
homepix(config)# static (inside,outside) 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0
homepix(config)# sh run static
static (inside,outside) 58.66.76.88 192.168.0.100 netmask
255.255.255.255
static (inside,outside) 172.16.0.0 172.16.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0
If you think that's arrogance, that's your opinion.
tv
----- Original Message ----- From: "Binh Phan" <[email protected]>
To: "Tony Varriale" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT and PAT on ASA
Wow! Arrogance at its best ;-)
Sure been around Cisco long enough and infact been _IN_ Cisco long
enough..
but I simply wanted to point out the fact that it was uneccessary
what you pointed out. No offense!!
On Jul 21, 2009, at 9:18 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
If you haven't been around Cisco long enough to know not to
assume, then be my guest.
But, that's poor advice to offer a person that is somewhat new
(or new) to Cisco. That's how bad habits start.
tv
----- Original Message ----- From: "Binh Phan" <[email protected]
>
To: "Tony Varriale" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NAT and PAT on ASA
On Jul 21, 2009, at 7:42 PM, Tony Varriale wrote:
I would recommend completing your static with the appropriate
netmask.
>>You do not need to specify netmask in this case since it's a /32
and will be auto-completed when you enter the command in CLI.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
