Hi, On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:51:42PM +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: > Link-local IP's are fe80::/10, so I planned to use fe80::/16 in my > network just by replacing first 16 bits of our public IP's. > > Can anyone say whether this is bad or wrong idea? :)
Bad *and* wrong.
Link-locals are neither announced nor configured, they are just *there*,
and it will always be fe80::/64 on every link.
If you want to do use "locally significant addresses", use ULAs.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpbJcTI8OLvl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
