On Monday, November 15, 2010 06:23:26 am Pete Lumbis wrote: > Only a guess, but I'd probably say they didn't test new > code with old rommon so they can't guarantee something > won't go wrong. I've seen plenty of times where it will > work perfectly fine forever, but if they never tested it > they don't want to make people believe it will work as > advertised.
You mean like a lot of current code on the NPE-300, for example :-)? Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
