any comments Dear friends would be most appreciated and very helpfull for me.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM, jack daniels <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm... laying intercity cables Technically good ....but not > commercialy (which is most important).. :) > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Keegan Holley > <[email protected]> wrote: >> You can always get a really long cable so you don't need the MUX's. >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, jack daniels <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I have a scenario >>> >>> >>> Router R1 --------------Ethernet >>> Cable-----MUX----------------MUX-----------Ethernet Cable-------Router >>> R2 >>> >>> >>> my MUX to MUX link flaps a lot and my traffic impacts ....I have >>> backup links also. Can I do something that when link MUX to MUX flaps >>> I dont >>> use this for some time , till it stablizes. >>> >>> Regards >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
