If a mux link down does bring the router interface down as well, you
could look at IP route dampening on the interface:
dampening ...
Otherwise kind of dynamic routing/BFD/IPSLA methods can be applied. E.g.
BGP with route dampening. Or tracked static routes with IPSLA object
tracking..
Regards,
Mindaugas
On 2010.11.27 20:03, jack daniels wrote:
any comments Dear friends would be most appreciated and very helpfull for me.
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM, jack daniels<[email protected]> wrote:
Hmm... laying intercity cables Technically good ....but not
commercialy (which is most important).. :)
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 1:43 AM, Keegan Holley
<[email protected]> wrote:
You can always get a really long cable so you don't need the MUX's.
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 2:49 PM, jack daniels<[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a scenario
Router R1 --------------Ethernet
Cable-----MUX----------------MUX-----------Ethernet Cable-------Router
R2
my MUX to MUX link flaps a lot and my traffic impacts ....I have
backup links also. Can I do something that when link MUX to MUX flaps
I dont
use this for some time , till it stablizes.
Regards
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
