I am, however, left with one mystery.
How can the Cisco docs on a FWSM claim a 30-usec latency when clearly it isn't capable of that, at least not in any configuration that I'm aware of? Granted that it's all lies, damn lies, and marketing material, but putting that number in the main data sheet on the main product page for the card is a pretty ballsy lie even for Cisco. From: David White, Jr. (dwhitejr) [mailto:dwhit...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 12:04 AM To: Jeff Bacon Cc: Pete Templin; Peter Rathlev; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance And here is a great doc TAC wrote up on single flow TCP performance which should answer all your questions: https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668 Sincerely, David. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
