On 6/3/2011 3:30 PM, Jeff Bacon wrote:
I am, however, left with one mystery.
How can the Cisco docs on a FWSM claim a 30-usec latency when clearly it
isn't capable of that, at least not in any configuration that I'm aware
of? Granted that it's all lies, damn lies, and marketing material, but
putting that number in the main data sheet on the main product page for
the card is a pretty ballsy lie even for Cisco.
From: David White, Jr. (dwhitejr) [mailto:dwhit...@cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 12:04 AM
To: Jeff Bacon
Cc: Pete Templin; Peter Rathlev; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] cat6500/fwsm performance
And here is a great doc TAC wrote up on single flow TCP performance
which should answer all your questions:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-12668
Sincerely,
David.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
How are you calculating that number? Right before it, it says 30ms.
What about that? Ever think it may be a typo? The way that stated that
sentence looks very ambiguous.
Typically Cisco is correct on the numbers, but how they calculate that
number isn't always obvious.
How do you calculate the Sup720 throughput?
tv
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
