Definitely possible. Create the VRF and interface like normal and then supply your VPDN group with the following line:
vpn vrf ProvXYZ Any resultant sessions will assume default routing table unless explicitly specified in your Virtual-Template or via RADIUS. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t15/feature/guide/ftvpdnmh.htm l Oliver -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stephen Fulton Sent: Saturday, 10 March 2012 2:35 AM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [c-nsp] VPDN-aware VRF Hi all, I want to terminate a VPDN tunnel within a VRF, but have the actual sessions exist within the global routing table. For example, provider XYZ has provided RFC1918 addresses for their LAC's, which I do not want to expose in my global table, but my customer's PPPoE sessions which would be delivered by provider XYZ must be within my global table with public IP addresses. From my understanding of the documentation, it seems possible but I want to confirm with my learned brethren. Thanks, -- Stephen _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
