Since everything looks like Ethernet, why not consider an ASA 5585-X? This is probably the cheapest thing you'll find that can do a gigabit of VPN.
Chuck -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 11:53 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Will the Cisco 2911 push GigE with NAT enabled ? Thats what I was afraid someone was going to say :) I guess its time to start looking into the ASRs and see what my options are. Thanks all! Really appreciate the help and information. Dave On 04/30/2012 08:50 AM, Aled Morris wrote: > On 30 April 2012 16:40, Dave <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Thank you all for the responses. I actually found the PDF shortly > after sending the e-mail. Sorry for wasting everyone's time. (Also a > part of me was hoping the PDF was wrong). So for an office router > that will do GigE + VPN + NAT anyone have any recommendations ? Is > it the ASR1k or bust now days ? > > > You're only going to get near gigabit performance with hardware > forwarding, so ASR is your best bet. Switch platforms with Layer 3 > (like the Catalyst 3560-X) aren't going to support the features you > need in their forwarding ASICs so you'll get performance worse than > the ISR2 you've already tried. > > Aled > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
