Hi, On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:00:25AM -0500, Ge Moua wrote: > +1 for: > * get a reasonable switch > > maybe something like a 2960-X (or higher) will provide for deeper > buffers during micro-burst use case.
As far as I have been told, the new E and X switches have the same amount
of buffers, because Cisco does not consider this to be a limitation.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpFY7BBZTWhP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
