On 10/30/2012 10:37 AM, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:00:25AM -0500, Ge Moua wrote: >> +1 for: >> * get a reasonable switch >> >> maybe something like a 2960-X (or higher) will provide for deeper >> buffers during micro-burst use case. > As far as I have been told, the new E and X switches have the same amount > of buffers, because Cisco does not consider this to be a limitation.
Yes. And older 2950s seem to behave better than their "new and improved [sic]" counterparts. Jeff _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
