> > > You need netflow enabled on the switch, then enable "ip flow ingress" and > "ip flow egress" on the interface you are interested in, then perform a "show > ip cache flow" > > In addition to all the caveats which render pre-Sup2T/DFC4 NetFlow on 6500 > extremely problematic, one ought never under any circumstances to enable > both ip flow ingress and ip flow egress on the same interface. > > Instead, use one or the other. But not both. >
Why? Is this detrimental? It would seem to be a likely configuration possibility if one has many 'local' links and only one or two 'outside' aggregate links. It would be easier to configure just ingress/egress on the couple, rather than ingress on all of them. And from a documentation perspective, would make things clear what was happening. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
