Hi, On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 04:35:11AM +0000, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > In addition to all the caveats which render pre-Sup2T/DFC4 NetFlow > on 6500 extremely problematic, one ought never under any circumstances > to enable both ip flow ingress and ip flow egress on the same > interface.
Why?
(I'm not doing it, but we have considered it as it might simplify configs
with lots of SVIs by only having netflow in+out on the "to core" interface,
with the added benefit of not netflow'ing "internal" traffic that you
might not want to see in the first place)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp4ebul7ILOM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
