Kinda gave up here..so instead of going to my root switch, I am running I cable from the Cisco, directly to the switch that handles only 172.18.132.x traffic (my VLAN 2).
Doing that now... From: Matlock, Kenneth L [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:18 AM To: Kevin Berry Cc: Peter Rathlev; Andrew Miehs; cisco-nsp Subject: RE: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config >From the Cisco's perspective it all looks fine. Vlan3 exists, SW2 is the STP root, all ports are in an STP forwarding state, and Gi0/1 and Gi0/2 are in dot1q trunk status now. Where is the default gateway IP on vlan3 you're trying to ping? Off the HP switch, or as an SVI off the Cisco switch? Everything in Cisco-land looks fine (but I can't tell you if the config you have pasted here is good, since I don't know that gear) Ken Matlock Network Engineer 303-467-4671 [email protected] Description: cid:[email protected] From: Kevin Berry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:46 PM To: Matlock, Kenneth L Cc: Peter Rathlev; Andrew Miehs; cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config ok, hopefully this answers some things. I have logged a few commands. I have a show of the etherchannel, po1. I have a show of STP, of vlans, and also a show of switchport. I only did that for gi 0/1 (have a blade there) and of an uplink port gi 0/20 and of the port channel po1. LEt me know what you guys think......I'm running out of time! Thanks so much for all your help! Attached is Cisco commands showing alot. Also, here is the switch on the other end showing vlans vlan 1 name "DEFAULT_VLAN" untagged 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15,17-20,23-36,39-48,Trk1-Trk2 ip address 10.10.0.13 255.255.0.0 no untagged 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16 ip igmp exit vlan 2 name "192_DMZ" untagged 2,4,6,8,10,12,14,16 tagged Trk1-Trk2 exit vlan 3 name "VLAN3" tagged Trk1-Trk2 exit vlan 100 name "VLAN100" tagged Trk1-Trk2 exit On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Matlock, Kenneth L <[email protected]> wrote: 1) Is VLAN3 in STP forwarding state on Gi0/1, Gi0/2, and wherever the root port is? 2) Is VLAN3 defined on the device on the other end of Portchannel1? Ken Matlock Network Engineer 303-467-4671 [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Berry [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:41 AM To: 'Peter Rathlev'; Andrew Miehs; Matlock, Kenneth L Cc: 'cisco-nsp' Subject: RE: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config Corrected this. Now gi 0/1 - 3 show up/up. My uplinks, gi 0/20 & 0/22 are also up/up. I can now ping the root switch from this switch on VLAN 1 (10.10.0.x) and VLAN 2 (192.168.1.x), but NOT VLAN 3 (172.18.132.x). This occurs over an etherchannel link that includes these 3 vlans. This is the case for both of my Cisco switches in this enclosure (redundant) talking back to my HP root. Checked the HP. The trunks are tagged for all of those vlans. From the HP, I can ping out to servers on all of those vlans without a hitch. -----Original Message----- From: Peter Rathlev [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:59 PM To: Kevin Berry Cc: cisco-nsp Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config On Thu, 2013-02-21 at 09:25 -0500, Kevin Berry wrote: > Now, the show inter trunk: ... > WHY is it that gi 0/1 & gi 0/2 are not here? I have hosts in those > slots, powered on, and need to be on VLANs 1,2,3, 100. Maybe they're down. The "operational mode" of "show interface Gi0/{1,2} switchport" should tell you what the port is like. -- Peter
<<image001.jpg>>
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
