What does Show interface trunk show? Sent from a mobile device
On 21/02/2013, at 9:05, "Kevin Berry" <[email protected]> wrote: > Etherchannel now shows only the two uplink ports, as below: > > Group Port-channel Protocol Ports >> ------+-------------+-----------+------------------------------------- >> ------+-------------+-----------+------ >> ---- >> 1 Po1(SU) LACP Gi0/20(P) Gi0/22(P) >> >> You original show etherchannel had too many ports in the portchannel. Have > you fixed this yet? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Miehs [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:03 PM > To: Kevin Berry > Cc: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] FW: Cisco blade switch config > > > > Sent from a mobile device > > On 21/02/2013, at 8:11, "Kevin Berry" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes, I am aware. My HP simply was configured something like: >> >> Config t >> Trunk 21-22 trk1 lacp >> Trunk 37-38 trk2 lacp >> Exit >> >> Then I made sure that those trunks were TAGGED for each VLAN. >> >> The HP switch, appears correct. I believe, even by review Then for >> Cisco, I built Etherchannel LACP from ports. My etherchannel summary >> now shows that gi 0/20 & 0/22 are in use and bundled in port channel. >> So that seems fine. > > >> My etherchannel for those ports was built for channel 1, or PO1. >> Config >> reads: >>> interface Port-channel1 >>> description HP CORE >>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100 switchport mode trunk >>> spanning-tree portfast trunk spanning-tree vlan 4-99 cost 20 ! >>> interface GigabitEthernet0/1 >>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100 switchport mode trunk speed >>> 1000 channel-group 1 mode active spanning-tree portfast ! >>> interface GigabitEthernet0/2 >>> switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-3,100 switchport mode trunk speed >>> 1000 channel-group 1 mode active spanning-tree portfast > > You original show etherchannel had too many ports in the portchannel. Have > you fixed this yet? > >> Now, this being the case, would you not expect these ports to carry >> traffic on those vlans (1,2,3,100) ? >> If I have a ESX host in gi 0/1 and it has vm's on 2 of those vlans, >> and 2 virtual switches are configured, one for each ip segment/vlan, >> then each VM should send traffic to my uplink ports, in this case gi >> 0/20 & 0/22, which will pass all those vlans on to the next switch? >> >> It is odd to me, as port gi 0/1 needs to be able to actually >> accommodate multiple vlans, so to me that would be a trunk. Then, to >> combine multiple ports to move traffic, I need the etherchannel (with >> LACP talking to the HP). It seems this all works fine as long as only >> 1 vlan is applied. AS soon as the expectation is for more than one vlan, > it ceases. > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
