Hi Tony, My company is considering buying some ASR1002 instead of ASR1001 though I have not understood the reasoning behind it yet (too good Cisco sales guy?). Could you give me more details on why you would stay away from systems with RP1 such as the 1002? That could give me some munition to root for the ASR1001. (I have used it at a previous job and liked that little box).
Thanks. On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Tony Varriale <tvarri...@comcast.net>wrote: > On 8/29/2013 9:12 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: > >> Same here - the RP2 in the ASR1001 will scale well when you >> run as many full feeds as you want. >> > It's not an RP2...more of a RP2 lite :) Also note the memory restriction > on the 1001 compared to a RP2 system. > > As a general thought, stay away from RP1 systems (such as a 1002). > > >> I'd go with 2x units if all you need is a handful of Gig-E >> ports and no SONET/SDH or other non-Ethernet requirements. >> > This +1. > > tv > > > ______________________________**_________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/**mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> > archive at > http://puck.nether.net/**pipermail/cisco-nsp/<http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/> > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
