Hi, all, Am 10.12.2013 um 14:10 schrieb Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu>: > On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 11:31:55 AM Patrick M. Hausen > wrote: >> And OTOH again - why would I not want to carry < 100 LSAs >> in my IGP? > > Because you should always assume you will grow. Having to > re-design the network in the future (or worse, leaving that > to someone else) should be avoid whenever possible.
I do have the knowledge and capacity to implement iBGP as my IGP *now*, except for the route reflectors suggested. Would you recommend that approach? I.e. going without the route reflectors and the communities first? It’s only 4-5 machines in total, after all, all Cisco. And no customers with BGP currently. Thanks Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 i...@punkt.de http://www.punkt.de Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
