Hi, On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:05:22AM +0300, Tarko Tikan wrote: > >As a background: there's carriers that require you to tag the traffic > >on the carrier side. Stupid idea? dunno. Breaking all sort of CPEs? > >betcha! > > He requested config for EFM (bonding). EFM and VDSL2 both have ethernet > encapsulation and use vlan tags instead ATM PVCs. > > Stupid? Don't think so.
Why require a vlan tag if there's only a single service on it?
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpTLXYj51YVR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
