Hi Chris, I have a number of the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G models running, mostly as redundant connections. I found them to be extremely reliable in terms of no lockups and reconnecting without issue, but after running for a while they seem to slow. For example, after a few days of running the speed drops about 50%.You restart the interface and it's back up to full speed for a few days again. *Disclaimer, I haven't actually done any investigation or raised any TAC cases so it may be something easily fixed. As I use the links for failover/redundancy in an emergency, this isn't much of an issue for me.
Cheers,Josh > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:35:00 -0500 > From: tknch...@gmail.com > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] VZW 4G LTE Interface Card > > Hello, > > Anyone have any experience with the EHWIC-4G-LTE-V card for VZW 4G? > > We have a 4G as a backup WAN for a small site and we currently have a > cradlepoint bridging the cellular over to a ethernet port and have that > connected to our router. The cradlepoint seems to flake out occasionally or > completely lock up requiring a hard reset and I was looking at getting this > EHWIC thinking it would be more reliable and also if we needed to login to > the router we might be able to see more technical info about the radio's > status etc. > > Mainly I am just looking for feedback from someone who has implemented it, > how difficult it was to build the configuration, how reliable, if there > were any gotcha's etc. > > TIA, > chris > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
