Josh, We use both the VZ and AT&T version of this card and have experienced the throttled situation with a couple of our AT&T sites. This has always turned out to be a configuration on AT&T's end where they are automatically throttling us to 3G speeds after so many GB have been downloaded. We have contracted services that is supposed to remove that limitation but it does not always get configured properly during provisioning, anytime we have run into this the problem is resolved quite quickly.
Other than that our experiences with these cards have been very good, we have close to 100 in the field used for the most part as backup to terrestrial connectivity - with more coming. We also have a double handful of sites using 4G as their primary data path. Far and away the bulk of our sites are on the VZ network. -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Joshua Riesenweber Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:20 AM To: chris; cisco-nsp@pu ck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] VZW 4G LTE Interface Card Hi Chris, I have a number of the EHWIC-4G-LTE-G models running, mostly as redundant connections. I found them to be extremely reliable in terms of no lockups and reconnecting without issue, but after running for a while they seem to slow. For example, after a few days of running the speed drops about 50%.You restart the interface and it's back up to full speed for a few days again. *Disclaimer, I haven't actually done any investigation or raised any TAC cases so it may be something easily fixed. As I use the links for failover/redundancy in an emergency, this isn't much of an issue for me. Cheers,Josh > Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 10:35:00 -0500 > From: tknch...@gmail.com > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject: [c-nsp] VZW 4G LTE Interface Card > > Hello, > > Anyone have any experience with the EHWIC-4G-LTE-V card for VZW 4G? > > We have a 4G as a backup WAN for a small site and we currently have a > cradlepoint bridging the cellular over to a ethernet port and have > that connected to our router. The cradlepoint seems to flake out > occasionally or completely lock up requiring a hard reset and I was > looking at getting this EHWIC thinking it would be more reliable and > also if we needed to login to the router we might be able to see more > technical info about the radio's status etc. > > Mainly I am just looking for feedback from someone who has implemented > it, how difficult it was to build the configuration, how reliable, if > there were any gotcha's etc. > > TIA, > chris > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
