On (2015-05-03 09:38 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote: Hi,
> > If anything, we’d migrate our entire MPLS core to LDPv6. Don’t hold your > > breath though :). > I plan on keeping both - LDPv4 and LDPv6. > The dual approach has worked well for plain IP, wouldn't mind keeping > the same strategy for MPLS. Why? I have more than acceptable amount of control-plane issues today, I'd need to hear very good justification to add state and signalling. I'd hope to run 6PE until I'd do fork-list to 4PE in some distance future. I see little to no benefits running dual-stack core. In CSCO/ALU^WNOK land, why bother with LDP6 even if there is justification, when you could do segment routing? In JNPR land I understand that you'll need to wait bit more. I see LDP6 as completely unnecessary technology. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
