On 3/May/15 10:59, Saku Ytti wrote: > Why? I have more than acceptable amount of control-plane issues today, I'd > need to hear very good justification to add state and signalling. I'd hope to > run 6PE until I'd do fork-list to 4PE in some distance future. I see little to > no benefits running dual-stack core.
It would be interesting to hear what control plane issues you are facing today. In as far as LDP is concerned, I have no issues on my end. > > In CSCO/ALU^WNOK land, why bother with LDP6 even if there is justification, > when you could do segment routing? In JNPR land I understand that you'll need > to wait bit more. > I see LDP6 as completely unnecessary technology. I'd love SR, but it's not yet ready, nor is it at a stage where it will signal LSP's for IPv6 traffic, based on current direction of actual development. I'm happy to use the technologies that are available. LDPv6 is. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
