Yes the ASR920 is certainly the way forward in this segment. Just remember this platform is still young and there are some rather annoying bugs and features missing.
For example when deployed as a layer2 FTTH device; 1. You cant do igmp snooping without the metroipaccess licens. Say what? 2. Switch can error-disable ports but cant recover. So you have to hack your own EEM script. Regards, Fredrik Vöcks CNO On 14 July 2015 at 09:22, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 13/Jul/15 17:44, James Jun wrote: > > You could also look into ASR 903 with RSP2A-128; max it out with IMA-2Z > cards to get 12x 10GE without oversubbing. Certainly not at the price of > 920's, but definitely beats 9001. > > There is still a lot of opportunity in this space. > > But with the AR920, Cisco have opened the door to new architectures that > could make it feasible to stick a sufficient number of 1Gbps/10Gbps > ports in a 1U chassis for a reasonable price. > > And no, no Broadcom chipsets, please... > > > > Yep, I mean it's a QFX 5100. > > Yep. > > > Cisco ASR 9xx are certainly more better suited IMO for edge > applications. > > Agree, although the ASR920/ME3600X is more my thing, as I'm more > Ethernet-centric without all the modularity or mobile-ness. > > Mark. > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
