Hi, On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 11:06:37AM +0000, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Or from a different angle why would they bother designing test procedure that > tests every possible permutation making sure the box is error free if no one > is using certain config combinations. The live audience makes sure they only > need to deal with the widely used features and not waste money on fixing > features that almost no one actually uses.
While that is a bit cynical, it would actually work *IF* they gave TAC
enough developer resources to then fix anything that comes up in reasonably
short time *AND* add regression tests to their setup to ensure that they
are not breaking this (obviously important) feature again with new code...
The "not enough support from dev" is one of my major gripes with TAC - these
folks are friendly and helpful, but if they are left dangling without
backend support, there's not much they can do.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpek3iBgkyuA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
