I believe the MX104 can do ~1.8 in FIB, and ~8mil in RIB. On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 8:42 PM, James Jun <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:37:36PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > Another reason I wouldn't spend money on an MX80. > > > > Even though the MX104 is a PPC-based platform, I'm okay to spend money > > on that because the RE is modular. > > > > Mark. > > Honestly, I like the ASR 9001 lot better than MX 104. > > I was somewhat dissapointed with MX104 when it came out; I was hoping it'd > do more bandwidth than MX80's 80 Gbps to get a couple more 10G ports out of > it; but it's practically MX80 on chassis form...and then we have craptastic > and overpriced RE that rivals Sup720 on BGP convergence. > > Also, doesn't the MX104 have the same 256MB RLDRAM as MX80 (like mpc1), so > you can only do up to ~1 to ~1.5M IPv4 routes max in FIB? or has this been > improved on the MX104? > > ASR 9001 on the other hand.. 120 Gbps in a 2U box and control-plane > performance is plenty fast (feels like RSP440), and up to 4M IPv4 in FIB so > it has longer life expectancy in DFZ. Also, you can start with ASR-9001-S > (60 Gbps license-locked version) to cheap out, and then upgrade to full 120 > Gbps later. The upgrade license cost is not penalizing as buying MX104/MX80 > upgrade licenses. You pretty much pay for the difference. > > Best, > james > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
