> On 20 Oct 2015, at 10:55, James Bensley <jwbens...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I will probably aim for 60k IPv6 routes, so it's enough to phase out > the boxes and that's it. Be careful that these boxes will start to CPU > switch packets before you run out of TACM. When you see these logs > you're in trouble;
Well, not exactly. Last I remember, it was changed in 12.2(33)SXH - when the PFC hits exception on TCAM, it’ll switch “exception” packets (packets to destination that’s outside of known TCAM programmed entries) with a mls hardware-limiter set to 10kpps. In other words - you’re safe, the box won’t melt, but the situation will require fixing & reload. -- Łukasz Bromirski, luk...@bromirski.net CCIE R&S/SP #15929, CCDE #2012::17 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
