I understood that this is only a test setup with just one switch involved where 
he wants to connect multiple APs to.
If i got this wrong, my bad and yes, he will need private vlans then.

/marc

> On 15 Jan 2016, at 16:02, Lukas Tribus <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> you could simply use the “protected port” feature.
> 
> How so? He would have to configure all the other ports AND the uplink
> in that vlan as protected as well, breaking connectivity for all
> hosts.
> 
> If only the AP port is configured as protected, the switch won't
> do anything different than without "switchport protected" config.
> 
> 
> Lukas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to