On 31/Oct/17 10:48, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Am I only one puzzled about MX204 port choice, 4xQSFP28 + 8xSFP+. > Seems like it's positioned to datacenters facing upstream? I'd want > 2xQSFP28 and maybe 36xSFP+ (oversub is fine), with attractive > licensing using SFP+ as SFP only, to add L3 DFZ 1GE aggregation box to > JNPR portfolio. > I can't imagine rolling this would be expensive, call it MX202 o > something. JNPR do me a solid. Still not exactly the Metro-E solution we've been longing for from Juniper, but I do see a use-case where customers in the Metro want 10Gbps ports. But that will be the exception, and not the rule. At least for us. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
