I'll second on that BGP-SD we use it everywhere we deploy them and works like a champ!
I'll also second the weakness of netflow using the video profile and the SFP issues after upgrade(s). Not so cool.. ________________________________ From: cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net> on behalf of Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 11:17 AM To: Erik Sundberg; Stephen Fulton; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ASR920 Opinions On 20/Dec/17 00:36, Erik Sundberg wrote: > > One down side is the 20K IPv4/IPv6 Route limit. So no full routes and we also > place a RT Filter on our VPNv4 sessions back to the core. BGP-SD is your friend. We hold a full IPv4/IPv6 table on each of them in RAM, which a handful of useful routes in FIB. Works great! It means we can offer our customers a native eBGP session with a full BGP table from the ASR920, i.e., no need for an eBGP Multi-Hop session into the "clever" core. Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp cisco-nsp Info Page - puck.nether.net<https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp> puck.nether.net To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the cisco-nsp Archives. Using cisco-nsp: To post a message to all the list members, send ... archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/