Hi,
Never feels good when you can't find a good explanation / do proper RCA
for an incident...
And you don't have any active support on the boxes? If you hit it again,
let us know; we're running a couple of Sup2T-XL too.
Regards,
Jeroen van Ingen
ICT Service Centre
University of Twente, P.O.Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
On 02-01-18 14:51, "Rolf Hanßen" wrote:
Hello,
on router #1 it happened again.
We then updated it to 15.2(1)SY5 (put luck) on Dec 6th and configured
prefix limits on all sessions allowing less tha 100k above current count.
On router #2 we did nothing.
Router #3 was false positive, issue did not occur at all (human error).
Nothing happened since the updates, no insertion issue, no prefix count hit.
So we have no clue what happened.
kind regards
Rolf
Hi,
I had 3 incidents within a week in which Sup2T-XL routers switched to
software forwarding.
I.e. log says:
%MLSCEF-4-FIB_TCAM_INSERT_FAIL: FIB entry insertion into tcam failed,
one
IPv4 route may be absent from hardware table
Haven't seen this one, but I'm interested to hear whether you've had new
occurrences... We're running newer code though, 15.2(1)SY5 currently,
because of several bugs in earlier releases.
Regards,
Jeroen van Ingen
ICT Service Centre
University of Twente, P.O.Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
