When I started sharing some routes from one vrf to another vrf during my deployment of cgnat, I came to understand that a vrf in my mind seemed to be less about the name you give it, and more about the RT's you import and export to accomplished the desired routing.
Further to that point, one day I typo'd a vrf name, and was stunned to realize that everything was still working! ...came to realize that the vrf name doesn't matter, since mp-ibgp doesn't advertised anything of the name... simply the rd, rt stuff matters. To Saku's point, if you have local and separate vrf's, I'm pretty sure I had to use an auto-export command in juniper to allow that local route sharing. -Aaron _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
