Unicast me one of your case numbers I want to see how you are getting past all 
the BS.

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Josh 
Warcop
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 2:28 PM
To: Mike ; 'Haas, Neal'; 'Bill Talley'
Cc: 'cisco-voip'
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

 

No magical powers here. I don't wait around for things to happen. 

A licensing error is still an error and the clients I work with have zero 
tolerance for this giant licensing banner popping up indicating they are out of 
compliance.

Sent from my Windows Phone

  _____  

From: Mike  <mailto:mik...@msn.com> 
Sent: ‎12/‎12/‎2014 11:23 AM
To: 'Haas, Neal' <mailto:nh...@co.fresno.ca.us> ; 'Bill Talley' 
<mailto:btal...@gmail.com> ; 'Josh Warcop' <mailto:j...@warcop.com> 
Cc: 'cisco-voip' <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> 
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

I’ve never seen it take that long once you are on the new licensing platform. 
The biggest issues I’ve seen is from pre-9.x to 9.x or 10.x

 

Josh must have magical powers because licensing is a nightmare.

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Haas, 
Neal
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2014 10:20 AM
To: 'Bill Talley'; Josh Warcop
Cc: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turnaround time 8.6 to 10.5

 

It just took us 39 days to get our licensing for 9.1.1 to 10.5

 

 

Neal Haas

 

From: cisco-voip [mailto:cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill 
Talley
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 3:50 PM
To: Josh Warcop
Cc: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turn around time 8.6 to 10.5

 

I can send you a list of several SRs offline.  We provide Cisco SOs, UCSS 
contracts, Cisco.com usernames, LCU files and PLM license requests.  The 
standard response WAS 5-7 business days, but within the past two weeks the 
standard response has increased to 10-12 business days while awaiting approval 
from a product manager.

Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
excude my typtos.


On Dec 11, 2014, at 5:45 PM, Josh Warcop <j...@warcop.com> wrote:

I'm not sure what licensing team you're working with but there is a specific 
migration team for Collab products. We do several upgrades monthly for clients 
and it has never been over 24 hours. Understanding everything that needs to be 
done prior to engaging TAC is usually the fault of the engineers or client.

SWSS Contract in place? If not still current  ESW/UCSS? Have you verified with 
UCSS support?  Has LCT been submitted properly with the online form? Has PUT 
been used properly to acquire any licensing?

This can all be done in advance and within a day. If you can't get the stuff 
via the automated methods and open a case presenting everything properly is 
necessary to get past level 1 GLO and to migration support. 

Like I mentioned earlier we are never two business days beyond getting ELM 
licensed after an upgrade.

Thanks!

Sent from my Windows Phone

  _____  

From: Bill Talley <mailto:btal...@gmail.com> 
Sent: ‎12/‎11/‎2014 6:36 PM
To: Erick Wellnitz <mailto:ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> 
Cc: cisco-voip <mailto:cisco-voip@puck.nether.net> 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] licensing turn around time 8.6 to 10.5

Hahahahahahahahahahaha...

Sorry I shouldn't laugh, but Cisco's license upgrade process for UC 10 is 
laughable at best.  Licenses have to be approved by a product manager and its 
now increased to a 10-12 business day process.   Luckily theres a lengthy grace 
period before you're locked out of provisioning the servers.

Sent from an Apple iOS device with very tiny touchscreen input keys.  Please 
excude my typtos.

> On Dec 11, 2014, at 5:19 PM, Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Quick question about licensing for CUCM/UCONN
> 
> Going from 8.6 to10.5 I should be able to run the license count tool and 
> submit to licensing along with a contract number, correct?  Is there usually 
> a long turn around time or is it still a day or less?
> 
> Thanks!
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Reply via email to