Ok, thanks for the clarification Eric. I did know about the special characters in the AXL password could cause the upgrade to fail.
Last section of the IM&P 10.5(1) Release Notes: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/10_5_1/CUCM_BK_CE15D2A0_00_cucm-release-notes-1051/CUCM_BK_CE15D2A0_00_cucm-release-notes-1051_chapter_0110.html#CUP0_RF_U1CD565E_00 Interestingly, this is not in the 10.5(2b) Release Notes http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/rel_notes/10_5_2/CUCM_BK_C6A7E384_00_cucm-release-notes-1052/CUCM_BK_C6A7E384_00_cucm-release-notes-1052_chapter_01.html PS, I have another person confirmed who has performed a Network Migration on both CUCM+IM&P at the same time. So far, I don't like my odds, but at least there's a success story or two out there. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:27 PM Eric Pedersen <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually, it might have been a user account with the same name, I can’t > recall exactly. We had an app user “vcsuser” on both for Expressway. There > also was a group called “VCS Users” for this purpose. One or both were > problematic. > > > > Fortunately I was able to find the problem in the upgrade logs. There was > a SQL error when it found the duplicate names. > > > > *From:* Anthony Holloway [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* 05 May 2015 12:17 PM > *To:* Eric Pedersen; Brian Meade > > > *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 10.5(3) and IM&P 9x to 10x > > > > That's good to know Eric. Which admin group specifically are you > referring to? Standard CCM Super Users? > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:57 PM Eric Pedersen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > We had an issue that caused our upgrade to fail: our admin group for > application users on both CUCM and IM&P had the same name. The DB migration > to CUCM didn’t like that. Renaming the IM&P group fixed that particular > problem. > > > > I informed TAC but the engineer decided not to enter a bug for it. > > > > *From:* cisco-voip [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf > Of *Brian Meade > *Sent:* 05 May 2015 9:36 AM > *To:* Anthony Holloway > *Cc:* Cisco VoIP Group > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] PCD 10.5(3) and IM&P 9x to 10x > > > > So I talked to my internal resource about this and it does work for some > people but breaks more often than not. They don't have a document written > up yet about the issues. > > > > I would say to give it a try but plan ahead for potentially rebuilding if > the upgrade fails. > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Anthony Holloway < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Brian, Do you have any links for us to read on the topic? That's > certainly a problem for me regardless of PCD. Thank you for addressing > this. > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:49 AM Brian Meade <[email protected]> wrote: > > My understanding is the upgrade process from IM&P 9.x to 10.x is > completely broken right now using any method and Cisco is recommending a > fresh rebuild on 10.x. > > > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Anthony Holloway < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Has anyone experience with PCD and performing a *Network Migration* on > IM&P? If not, how about performing a *Network Migration* on CUCM, and > then how did you handle IM&P? > > > > Thanks. > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/r/gOIAcDYYWAfdb-dWIW7qXaN6INmJILqbPQayhm5FlsgC3FrQe7y58INQ6Hk_gE_llMZkl9DmP0G03Ndm8JxRVCbv2ODyTvSUQHeaXKgIS8D5ib99E_ytiPt-r1ea7llOq5vrR2ed3IXoe7-LIlvXxqsjD3YT8bMCfePIqwcJxHs1v45DMag8d0I0Z4YNGEDPR5-pqosrDeFv29ige5Mji4wCaOCcLh-Q0G_nC3lilW_90w2LZK6EquM01GB1pF5xNpdJHjKiwroecwQ-YcR6q2sPa64lkPfgiAzd5tqirPG2KqzCZtaKroqBN2KwdG3zcGFsAEcRVnmCzLqHQnD_n2yrfoTiMdhDvZIo2KgWU1H27HIzQOHSAL-HcaKPHRmDNkq9y43HT2s-kSpudcm4Ou5CfhhmsMgYHudTxQt2TeihXkVqdLP8Tmz2m8UlCCEe6xr8I_w8l9Y3VH6aynsIfgyZyBgfl27morvPE3Dj9rxX6hJKEVEbHHotklUhVr5YcqzL-sF28_Qj8b56IDKEN2YiUDR0StSOSvdbZYalU-FatQNOPE_rHCXwIzt-lOIYFqCdYDw-2WgnR7C26svkcGrcnnqicEfDyACYvMCv87N21C5JkOl9NJDiy1vDm-saIBEs7gboOWmk-uG4LCf2Xg> > > > > > > The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged > subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact > the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail > communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties. > If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us > at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such notification, your > consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail, > we will not take any additional security measures (such as encryption) > unless specifically requested. > > If you no longer wish to receive commercial messages, you can unsubscribe > by accessing this link: http://www.bennettjones.com/unsubscribe > <https://protect-us.mimecast.com/r/u54B3UcxPd6yNt2GFCX0Jfm8B-c6PkbfE2gp_K36Kqut2HXrgUw_qRijVkGsMmqPQ-e8TeaCRchWDX3wkNgQQCxRnwOzsme6GcWTwRVvI2vk3V9wIAdyE4xUh1pC2z7mxgPgw8MUCxxfAqXIjF4Mh3ZHux9nco6DKQXqR1U8_WD9TGlv-VbpK5HAH8BS0VgyKNIA8OHSMNAvgi4uKM_WldFe2xiq_y6xYxrKnXUfua222DYC6A8tulSA5rbLxwHD> > > > The contents of this message may contain confidential and/or privileged > subject matter. If this message has been received in error, please contact > the sender and delete all copies. Like other forms of communication, e-mail > communications may be vulnerable to interception by unauthorized parties. > If you do not wish us to communicate with you by e-mail, please notify us > at your earliest convenience. In the absence of such notification, your > consent is assumed. Should you choose to allow us to communicate by e-mail, > we will not take any additional security measures (such as encryption) > unless specifically requested. > > If you no longer wish to receive commercial messages, you can unsubscribe > by accessing this link: http://www.bennettjones.com/unsubscribe >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
