Not too mention, Cisco doesn't consistently apply the bootable VS non-bootable policy to their apps. E.g., IM&P and UCCX ISOs from CCO are bootable.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:30 PM Charles Goldsmith <w...@woka.us> wrote: > I'm 100% beside you, I've yet to see them look at it, just not something > I'm willing to risk though. > > With the way licensing is these days, the restrictions of bootable ISO > downloads is kinda silly. I see no reason why they restrict it, since if > we really wanted to, we can download the publicly available ISO, add the > bootrom, boot it up, change root login, and do what we want. Restricting > the bootables only slows down our support for the customer. > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 12:26 PM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: > >> Totally see your point. >> >> While I guess it may be a possibility, TAC has never, in my experience, >> come close to digging that deep to look for an exit from a support request >> (which is conceivably why they would look that deep since it poses no >> functional risk). In my 20+ years of experience with TAC and Cisco, as long >> as the “thing” is under a support contract, TAC is far more willing to >> assist you than to look for an exit. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 6, 2020, at 12:42, Charles Goldsmith <w...@woka.us> wrote: >> >> >> Agreed, but I've never done this for a customer, and here is my >> reasoning. From my understanding, when you install/upgrade, the md5 of the >> iso used is written into the logs or a file on the system. If TAC were so >> inclined, they could tell if you installed from valid media or not. >> >> Granted, I've had TAC supplied bootable media fail the media test and not >> match md5, but was cleared in writing to use it. >> >> I've never had TAC check my files before, but there is always the >> possibility. >> >> PUT can be a bit delayed (at least it has been for me), but never more >> than about 24 hours. Seems we get most orders in within 12 - 18 hours. >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ryan Huff <ryanh...@outlook.com> wrote: >> >>> I can handle the bootable issue far faster and more efficiently than the >>> PUT process can, which is one of the reasons why I’ve found PUT to not be >>> super useful to me. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Feb 6, 2020, at 11:33, Pawlowski, Adam <aj...@buffalo.edu> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> As far as I know, ordering from PUT creates a sales order number that is >>> used for entitlement when migrating your licenses. It also gives you a >>> bootable ISO or should. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* cisco-voip <cisco-voip-boun...@puck.nether.net> *On Behalf Of *Nick >>> via cisco-voip >>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 6, 2020 11:20 AM >>> *To:* cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] 12.5 Upgrade files posted on CCO >>> >>> >>> >>> The upgrade files for CUCM 12.5 both SU1 and SU2 both state the >>> following >>> >>> >>> >>> For upgrades from 12.x only. Upgrades from 11.x or earlier are requested >>> via PUT >>> >>> >>> >>> Is this just incorrect wording as far as i am aware there has never been >>> any different files for upgrades from 11 or 12, I have ordered 12.5.1 SU1 >>> from PUT and the upgrade file is identical to the one you can download from >>> CCO supposedly for 12 only? >>> >>> >>> >>> Anyone able to confirm these are the same files? >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-voip mailing list >>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >>> >>> https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ce8ead415b0184407467f08d7ab2240bd%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637166035922535203&sdata=XxLnfHbAA5ShezR82O0U%2BZQy%2B2XpZowwZ%2BZ5QDtsacc%3D&reserved=0 >>> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248718633&sdata=ZIlMYNREw5lOrTLV49aUedbFRZ15Nnj14PNZ745gwO4%3D&reserved=0> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-voip mailing list >>> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >>> <https://eur02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpuck.nether.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcisco-voip&data=02%7C01%7C%7C3b05623a7e6548c6112508d7ab2be0d2%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637166077248728637&sdata=sbYrnAkK%2BFhL5FXCGHStfpbG9EZ1Z10ATKwYnP6iWYc%3D&reserved=0> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-voip mailing list >> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip >
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip