Hi Darren ,

Do you have a reference on cco stating that cisco will
no longer support ISL in the future ?


thanks,
flem

--- Darren Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well the advantage is that I saw was that some
> switching modules are supported
> in 5.x that aren't supported in 4.x
> 
> I think it was the 36 port 10/100 switching modules
> from memory.
> 
> I think there might have also been something with
> NetFlow enhancements in 5.x
> over 4.x?
> 
> Both do support ISL but remember Cisco themselves
> have stated that they will not
> support ISL in the future and that VLAN's should use
> dot1q from now on.
> 
> In fact there are some 28xx and 29xx switches that
> now cannot support ISL!
> I know the 2824G with new software cannot for sure!
> 
> Darren
> 
> Mark Holloway wrote:
> 
> > I know the Catalyst 5000 Supervisor 1 engine only
> supports LAN Switching IOS
> > 4.x and lower due to the 16MB memory limit.  Some
> Sup 2 modules only support
> > 4.x, some support 5.x, but are there really any
> advantages to running IOS
> > 5.x versus 4.x?  If not, are there any advantages
> of 4.x on a Sup 2 versus a
> > Sup 1?  Do they all support ISL?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark
> >
> > ___________________________________
> > UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/

___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to