I totally agree. I can tolerate ambiguity in these tests. But there were
many sentence structure and grammatical errors as well. I found myself
trying to think of what the exam writer was trying to communicate because
the actual sentence was either meaningless or open to several different
interpretations. The typos didn't help either. Good luck on your next try.
Warren Shubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> This test totally smokes choad. I have yet to see a more poorly written
> Sylvan test, even from Microsoft. There were more than a number of
questions
> that were totally ambiguous, or the grammar/spelling were foul. Also,
there
> is also a lot of confusion over whether to type the full command verbatim,
> or drop a consanant here or there, etc. due to the Cert Guide not
following
> the guidelines of the exam.
>
> I used both of the Chappel books to study. Will give it another shot this
> weekend I think.
>
> W.
>
> ___________________________________
> UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ---
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
