Just a thought, I've never done this myself - create a second loopback interface and use that? That is, if they really need double OSPF processes - I agree with you that it would be best to see why they are using two OSPF processes in the first place and see if you can do things a different way. JMcL ---------------------- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 09/06/2000 14:56 --------------------------- "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 09/06/2000 11:40:18 Please respond to "George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA) Subject: Double OSPF process I have a customer whose router running double ospf processes, example, one is ospf 1800 and the other as ospf 1801. And then, a lookback0 is set for Router ID. The problem now is the lo0 is captured by ospf 1801 as its Router ID but ospf 1800 could get only a Rounter ID in a serial line. It's not good I think. Because ospf 1800 is more important than 1801. Also I think it's not good to configure duble ospf process in a single router, instead, another internal routing protocol is required, such as EIGRP, and redistribute it. Could you give me some suggestion about this? Thanx Regards George
|
I have a customer whose router running double ospf processes,
example, one is ospf 1800 and the other as ospf 1801. And then, a lookback0 is
set for Router ID. The problem now is the lo0 is captured by ospf 1801 as its
Router ID but ospf 1800 could get only a Rounter ID in a serial line. It's not
good I think. Because ospf 1800 is more important than 1801. Also I think it's
not good to configure duble ospf process in a single router, instead, another
internal routing protocol is required, such as EIGRP, and redistribute
it.
Could you give me some suggestion about this?
Thanx
Regards
George
|
