hello,
This refers to your other
mail "ip and subnet" also....a few observations:
Do u really have so many hosts on each floor that u need to
choose a /16 subnet?
If not, then this is a wasteful use of Ip
address space. I hope u have concluded that floor-wise
subnetting is the best option after studying ur traffic pattern.
The easiest thing for u would be to trash this
addresing scheme, and go for a completely new scheme..
I suggest :
All routers and servers on 192.168.1.0/24.(of course, i'm
totally ignoring your assigned IP from the ISP :-) )
1st Floor : all hosts on 192.168.2.0/24
2nd Floor : all on 192.168.3.0/24
3rd Floor : all on 192.168.4.0/24 and so on
And to make things easier administratively, mebbe u could just
use dynamic addressing floor-wise....
regards,
kishor
>Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:11:50 GMT
>From: "SH Wesson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: IP Addressing > >I currently have one floor where my routers and servers are. These are >address as 10.100.1.x and 10.100.2.x addresses with a subnet of /16. I'm >adding two more floors. However, in adding two more floors can I address >these floors as for instance 10.100.11.x, 10.100.12.x, 10.100.13.x, and >10.100.14.x with a subnet mask of /24. I'm confused as to how this may work >if I have them all at a /24 subnet mask, a /16 subnet mask in the current >floor and /24 subnet mask in the new floors, or even changing everything >including the existing floor and new floors all to reflect /24. Any help >with this ip address stuff and how the new floors can be integrated would be >greatly appreciated. Thanks. |
- IP Addressing SH Wesson
- IP Addressing Kishor Bhagwat
- IP Addressing SH Wesson