Hi there
Thx Atif
Its me and my Motorolas again !
We need both 16 & 18 to be switched through serial 0
I left 16 out because I reckoned the inverse arping will take care of that
to create the pvc map .
Is it possible to make multiple statements on a single physical interface ?
Thx in advance
Cheers
Olden
-----Original Message-----
From: Atif Awan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 11:10 AM
To: Olden Pieterse; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay Switching
it should be like this
Interface serial 0
Frame-relay route 16 interface serial 1 18
Interface serial1
Frame-relay route 18 interface serial 0 16
provided you want to announce DLCI 16 on serial 0 and DLCI 18 on serial 1
and interconnect them to form a PVC ...
I am not getting why you have also written 18 on serial 0 ??
Regards
Atif
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Olden Pieterse
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 1:30 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Frame Relay Switching
Hi there gang
Is my assumption right concerning this frame relay switching scenario ?
Cisco DLCI 16
Ser0| |Ser1
| |
------------------------| |-----------------------
DLCI 16 DLCI 18
DLCI 18
Interface serial 0
Frame-relay route 18 interface serial 1 16
Interface serial1
Frame-relay route 18 interface serial 0 16
Thx
Olden Pieterse
MCP , CCNA , BCMSN , BSCN , BCRAN
Brainbench Certified CISCO Network Implementation Specialist
Technical Consultant
Mobile : +27 82 410 8621
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]