At 09:53 AM 7/4/00 -0700, Cormac Long wrote:
>There are 2 problems with the route-map.
>
>1. Syntax should be "set ip next-hop serial0"
>2. There is no match in the map for 192.168.2.0 so
>those packets will get dropped.
>
I agree with point#1, but not point#2. The original route-map was like so...
>> route-map test permit 10
>> match ip address 10
>> set interface serial0
>>
>> route-map test permit 20
>> set interface serial1
>>
>> access-list 10 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
>>
Sequence #20 in the route-map, because it contains no match and is a permit
statement, is going to act like a "permit ip any any" at the end of an
access-list. So anything that doesn't match sequence #10 will definitely
match #20 and be sent out serial1 (once the 'set' command syntax has been
corrected). The packets wouldn't be dropped unless it was a deny statement.
Jamie Byrne
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
