Hello,
Thanks for your reply ...
The link is a T1 with HDLC, no PVC, no FR, no ATM, ...
simple leased line.
Do you have any ideas for compatibility between IOS ?
Thanks,
-----Original Message-----
From: Xanathar [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 12:52 PM
To: Cisco Wave
Subject: RE: Compression compatibility
point to point, frame relay, multilink, single link?
with point to point i have found stac to provide
overall the best <as memory
requirements for Ios is overrated and stac uses memory
more then processor>
simply use the command "compress stac" on both ends of
the interface
<provided its point to point> and it will compress
everything it can
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Cisco Wave
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2000 11:23 PM
To: Cisco Group Study
Subject: Compression compatibility
Dear All,
We are running at 90%, and we need to use compression
on a T1 link.
Which one will provide the best results : Predictor,
Pay,load, or Stac ?
I heard that Predictor was better, but please advice
me.
Also, do you know if there are incompatibilities
between IOS versions ?
Do all the following IOS use the same algorithm, are
they compatible for compression ?
One cisco 2620 is running 12.0(5).T1 and the other end
is a cisco 7206 running 11.2(16)P.
Is there any hardware issue, one side is using
PowerQUICC Serial, and the other one is using M4T
hardware ?
Thank you for your help.
=====
We are NOT Cisco Inc.
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
http://invites.yahoo.com/
___________________________________
UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/guide.html
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
