I've never had to implement a dns change, but supposedly yes it does change the payload. there is only a few services where is does these payload changes though. another big one used to be ping, NATing modifies the payload of that also.
scott ""Charles D Hammonds"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > from the below link: > > > Is that accurate??? The "ip nat outside source" command will translate the > IP in the PAYLOAD of the DNS reply packet even though it is not the > source??? doesn't sound right and I am unable to test it rite now... > > Charles > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 1:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Natting problem...help!!! [7:66111] > > > You could get around this by doing a two way nat, or as cisco calls it, > nating for overlapping networks .. > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_examp > le09186a0080093f30.shtml > > JP wrote: > > > > I have the following scenario > > > > ------------0-------------------0----------------------telnet > > application > > network3 network 1 network 2 > > lan wan link > > > > I need all hosts on network 3 to telnet to my "telnet > > application" > > Problem is network 3 and network 2 both have the same ip range. > > > > My question is the following: > > Is there any way i can perform natting to allow network 3 hosts > > to telnet to > > the application and use an ip address other than the one > > assigned to the > > application as the destination address??? > > > > Any ideas appreciated > > > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66406&t=66111 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
