Yup!!! Hats off to Peter......He has really done an excellent job with
Isis.....I really understood redistribution to and from Isis with other
protocols based on his paper.....It sure was worth the 3 month
subscription.....

Some other papers are also very good....like Chuck's 3550 guide and the
isdn guide by Wolsefer....

;->

>From: "John Neiberger" >Reply-To: "John Neiberger" >To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: ISIS Van Oene [7:66572] >Date: Tue, 1
Apr 2003 03:05:35 GMT > >""richard dumoulin"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Guys, > > > >
After some lectures related to ISIS (Doyle, Caslow ect...), I am now > >
assimilating the stuff by reading the two parts CertZone papers rewritten
>by > > Peter VanOene. As I am enjoying the reading, a strange thing is
happening >to > > me. The guides are very good, and now that I understand
ISIS I am starting > > to love this routing protocol !! That's the first
time it happens to me. > > Before, I just liked EIGRP because of its
configuration simplicity but >ISIS > > seems much more scalable, flexible
etc... and exactly here is where its > > beauty resides. I can even say
that it is helping me in understanding OSPF > > much more because of the
comparisons. > > I never thought I could say such things about a routing
protocol. > > Just wanted to write my thoughts. > > Thanks Peter !! > > >
> note: and forgive my english. > >If it's any consolation, I had the
same reaction to ISIS after I had studied >it for a while. It's pretty
cool, I must say. Its major downfall is that >troubleshooting in ISIS can
be more difficult because the output of many of >the commands is
misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

------------------------------------------------------------------------




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66608&t=66572
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to