should work fine. You can also test this out by sending a constant data stream via ftp or something and then start a voice conversation.
""dj"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I'm setting up LLQ over hub-'n-spoke frame-relay WAN and want to use the > following funky looking access-list to mark voice packets for the high > priority queue. This access-list logically works, but my question is: > Is this legal? > access-list 101 permit ip any 10.10.X.201 0.0.255.248 precedence > critical > > I have 8 IP phones at each remote site starting at 4th octet IP address > of 201 (thru 208). > Each remote site is on a class C network, where the 3rd octet IP address > labeled X is designated as the site location. > eg: 10.10.1.0/24 is site 1; 10.10.2.0/24 is site 2; 10.10.3.0/24 is > site 3, etc. > > Will the IOS allow this non-conventional access-list to work per my > intensions? > > regards, > dj Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66785&t=66769 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
